The "Vergulde Draeck" Omen

The "Gilt Dragon" Omen

== or ==




The Foreign Exchange "parity condition" that will announce then end of the US Dollar


 

Abstract

There is a four currency Quadruple Witching Condition or "Omen" that will announce the decline and collapse of the United States Dollar (USD). The USD is no longer sustainable as a viable exchange currency due to internalities occurring within the American nation state. The US society (and economy) are undergoing an ongoing and unrecoverable compete and total systemic collapse.

When the four currency 'basket' Foreign Exchange (FOREX) "parity conditions" are reached with the AUD, CAD, CHF & NZD

Typically physical possession of precious metals and physical commodities are considered the key to survival during adverse economic conditions. So Precious Metals (as an asset class) will probably increase in value against the USD quasi-exponentially.


 
Summary

The endstage decline of the US as a meaningful world economic, military and cultural power will begin with a substantial and substantive currency collapse. Total failure and collapse has thousands of parents.
The US probably has 250 million surplus people -- that the US finance system and economy can no longer afford to support.


As things stand now, the USD cannot lose for being totally defeated.

After these financial events have run their course : there will no exterminated tiger rebound of the USD's value until multiple solar cycles have passed. The US will essentially cease to be a nation state worth investing in, and it will only continue on as a place for all possible existent wealth to be extracted and immediately repatriated elsewhere. 

Many observers view the ongoing collapse of the US currency and economy as having started in structural changes made in the finance system as far back as the late 1960s to mid-1970s. A substantial number of observers of the US economy view the conditions for the collapse of the US dollar as having originated in structural changes made from the 1910s to 1940s. The collapse of the USD and economy may simply be inevitable, a price for failing to live within a nation state's natural limits.


The Quadruple Witching Condition

Regardless of historical or natural precedents -- when the CONDITION is reached -- the world economic system will have to find a new way of running itself. We live in interesting times, but for Australia, Canada and NZ this will not be fun.


Symbols used

THE CONDITION

[Binary] If and only if
{

AUD => USD;
&
CAD => USD;
&

NZD => USD;
&

CHF => USD;

} returns True for Duration

Then expect the US Dollar to decline in value by up to nearly 80% (or its equivalent Standard Deviation) in SDR units in the near or immediate future, depending on the durations of the parity events.


Durations of the "parity conditions" signalling collapse





Note :
All of these duration conditions should be seen in terms of probability curves. Most of these probability curves are (and will be) by nature nearly identical to each other. The parameter "loss" (floor, ceiling) will change as expected, but this is explicitly understood. However, triggerings of the "omen" greater than an hour, but less than 2 days will signal unclear but known (yet reasonably expectable) "predictable losses" in value of the USD.


Reasons for choosing this basket of currencies for the Quadruple Witching Condition  

Quadruple Witching Conditions : Why do they apply now and not at other times (with these specific currencies)?

  • There is a lot of hidden order in the global finance system. If you follow the money (as one always does in the FOREX market) the hidden patterns can become obvious.
  • The "Hindenburg Omen" (for example) has more  complex conditions than this witching condition does, but is blind to FOREX.
  • The FOREX market runs continuously with heavy non-linear conditions (lack of investor knowledge, herding, belief in things that are not true ...). However, once a currency is understood to be toxic by all parties involved -- it is doomed.
  • These FOREX boundary conditions could never have applied to the USD before the Nixon Shock.
  • The global finance system was run differently before the late 1960s.
  • The 'refusenik' currency is the NZD, as it has yet to see USD parity. This 'contrary to expectations' behaviour cannot last indefinitely.
  • The FOREX markets cannot be perpetually pessimistic about the NZD.

Why measure loss in USD value in SDRs when the USD is itself part of the SDR? There clearly are some profound set theory problems here!
  • No other neutral (non-national) currency was otherwise suitable or available.
  • The SDR is not [and cannot be] a national currency. These 'witching conditions' occur only with national currencies -- and not with synthetic currencies like the SDR.
  • The USD's role in the SDR has been declining since the SDR was created (except for 2001-2010).
  • The USD may not be in the SDR basket of currencies in the 2020s.
  • During a global economic crisis precious metals  become too volatile in price to use for the measurement of a collapsing national currency in spite of their stability against inflation.
  • There are no equivalent (non-metal) commodities that are stable enough to use in place of precious metals for measuring a currency's decline.
  • SDR value changes (when looked at in discreet timeframes that are less than a calendar month) don't pose complex mathematical or accounting issues that would exist in 3 to 9 month timeframes.
  • Each 21 calendar days should be viewed as an "autonomous discreet SDR value measurement block" for the purpose of measuring a declining national currency. The separable 'moving averages' in these "windows" measured over the Accounting Cycle matter here. 
  • Using Standard Deviation unit values (versus % change) for this kind of FOREX quanta can be problematic.
          

Notes

The UK Pound and Euro play no part in this "omen" for the following reasons


There are no substantial or substantive "Canary in the coal mine" effects with respect to the the UK Pound or Euro currencies against the US Dollar. This FOREX structural issue is reasonably obvious to those who have studied these currencies since 1970.

Because of the nature of the FOREX market, a currency's decline or advance can only be measured in effectively in absolute terms against another currency (or precious metals, or commodities like Copper, Coal, Cadmium etc ... as some analysts do).

Once the change in value has been measured in absolute terms, then differentials can be measured and quantified -- and only then can relative gains and losses be seen. There are multiple divergent views on the best way to measure a change in a currency's value over time, and the issue is ultimately considered unresolved.

Unusual post 2007 Global Finance Crisis FOREX market signals

The 'bizarro world' (AUD => CAD) vs USD has become emergent since late March to early April 2011. However, there have been many brief triggers of this condition since 2007 due to global market FOREX instabilities. The AUD > CAD has not become a permanent new FOREX trading condition, but there is no evidence to prove that this is not a new (and permanent) currency relationship. 

In the entire history of the AUD and CAD versus the USD since 1901

Known Analytical Economics issues

A basket of (fiat) currencies inherently poses severe "real value" measurement problems. These value measurement problems are partly related to the matrix algebra "FOREX market currency relationships" and to the way in which currencies themselves that are "attributed value" in the FOREX market.

A currency's (gain-or-loss) quantization path structure
  1. SDR-change --> Percent-change 
  2. SDR-change --> Percent-change --> Standard-deviation-change
  3. SDR-change --> Standard-deviation-change

References

Currencies

Related topics

Analytical Economics

General topic
Economic "omens"

Related events


Geographical places of interest



Placque commerating the VOC
            shipwreck in Australia.


Notice


Created by Initial Idea
Last Revised
Current Version
Last Change
Max Power 07 April 2009 15 March 2011 20 October 2011 AUD > CAD paradox